In the interim, there was rapid production of Medicare LCDs which markedly limited payments for pharmacogenetic testing. OIG/DOJ had concerns about overuse, Genomeweb here.
I pulled some data together in preparation for an October slide presentation, and I've posted some key screenshots below.
click to enlarge |
click to enlarge |
click to enlarge |
For a broader view of CY2017 mopath codes and spending at CMS, here.
______________________________
Data Sources
You can access and download CMS data for all Part B CPT Codes by year, here. Every year 2000-2017.
I've also put the CLFS codes (80,000 series) in the cloud in one zip file, for the five years 2013-2017, here. 2013 was the first year of the current MoPath codes.
Extra Credit
Let's say you are a lab CFO or lab industry financial analyst.
In 2014, you projected that CYP revenues would be level in 2015, 2016, and 2017 (at $315M per year, the same as CY2014). In fact, revenues would prove to be only ($108M, $18M, $17M) in those years, creating a gap of ($206M + $296M + $297M). The total gap between your projection of steady 2014 revenue and actual revenue over three years would be negative $800M.
OIG Interests
A sampling of news articles imaged below. The drop in molecular spending 2014 -> 2015 was noted in a 2016 OIG report here.